Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(4)2021 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1110431

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may lead to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which, in turn, may be associated with multiple organ dysfunction. In this review, we present advantages and disadvantages of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating phytocannabinoid from the cannabis plant, as a potential agent for the treatment of COVID-19. CBD has been shown to downregulate proteins responsible for viral entry and to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Preclinical studies have demonstrated its effectiveness against diseases of the respiratory system as well as its cardioprotective, nephroprotective, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective and anti-convulsant properties, that is, effects that may be beneficial for COVID-19. Only the latter two properties have been demonstrated in clinical studies, which also revealed anxiolytic and antinociceptive effects of CBD (given alone or together with Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol), which may be important for an adjuvant treatment to improve the quality of life in patients with COVID-19 and to limit post-traumatic stress symptoms. However, one should be aware of side effects of CBD (which are rarely serious), drug interactions (also extending to drugs acting against COVID-19) and the proper route of its administration (vaping may be dangerous). Clearly, further clinical studies are necessary to prove the suitability of CBD for the treatment of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/pharmacology , Animals , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Cannabidiol/adverse effects , Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Virus Internalization/drug effects
2.
Pharm Stat ; 20(3): 675-691, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1086533

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has manifold impacts on clinical trials. In response, drug regulatory agencies and public health bodies have issued guidance on how to assess potential impacts on ongoing clinical trials and stress the importance of a risk-assessment as a pre-requisite for modifications to the clinical trial conduct. This article presents a simulation study to assess the impact on the power of an ongoing clinical trial without the need to unblind trial data and compromise trial integrity. In the context of the CANNA-TICS trial, investigating the effect of nabiximols on reducing the total tic score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS-TTS) in patients with chronic tic disorders and Tourette syndrome, the impact of the two COVID-19 related intercurrent events handled by a treatment policy strategy is investigated using a multiplicative and additive data generating model. The empirical power is examined for the analysis of the YGTSS-TTS as a continuous and dichotomized endpoint using analysis techniques adjusted and unadjusted for the occurrence of the intercurrent event. In the investigated scenarios, the simulation studies showed that substantial power losses are possible, potentially making sample size increases necessary to retain sufficient power. However, we were also able to identify scenarios with only limited loss of power. By adjusting for the occurrence of the intercurrent event, the power loss could be diminished to different degrees in most scenarios. In summary, the presented risk assessment approach may support decisions on trial modifications like sample size increases, while maintaining trial integrity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Computer Simulation , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Mental Health , Physical Distancing , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Tic Disorders/drug therapy , Tics/drug therapy , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/transmission , Cannabidiol/adverse effects , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Dronabinol/adverse effects , Drug Combinations , Endpoint Determination , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Research Design/statistics & numerical data , Sample Size , Severity of Illness Index , Tic Disorders/diagnosis , Tic Disorders/psychology , Tics/diagnosis , Tics/psychology , Time Factors , Tourette Syndrome/drug therapy , Tourette Syndrome/psychology , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(10): e21743, 2020 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-982837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak was designated a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. The relationship between vaping and contracting COVID-19 is unclear, and information on the internet is conflicting. There is some scientific evidence that vaping cannabidiol (CBD), an active ingredient in cannabis that is obtained from the hemp plant, or other substances is associated with more severe manifestations of COVID-19. However, there is also inaccurate information that vaping can aid COVID-19 treatment, as well as expert opinion that CBD, possibly administered through vaping, can mitigate COVID-19 symptoms. Thus, it is necessary to study the spread of inaccurate information to better understand how to promote scientific knowledge and curb inaccurate information, which is critical to the health of vapers. Inaccurate information about vaping and COVID-19 may affect COVID-19 treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Using structural topic modeling, we aimed to map temporal trends in the web-based vaping narrative (a large data set comprising web-based vaping chatter from several sources) to indicate how the narrative changed from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We obtained data using a textual query that scanned a data pool of approximately 200,000 different domains (4,027,172 documents and 361,100,284 words) such as public internet forums, blogs, and social media, from August 1, 2019, to April 21, 2020. We then used structural topic modeling to understand changes in word prevalence and semantic structures within topics around vaping before and after December 31, 2019, when COVID-19 was reported to the World Health Organization. RESULTS: Broadly, the web-based vaping narrative can be organized into the following groups or archetypes: harms from vaping; Vaping Regulation; Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment; and Vaping Lifestyle. Three archetypes were observed prior to the emergence of COVID-19; however, four archetypes were identified post-COVID-19 (Vaping as Harm Reduction or Treatment was the additional archetype). A topic related to CBD product preference emerged after COVID-19 was first reported, which may be related to the use of CBD by vapers as a COVID-19 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our main finding is the emergence of a vape-administered CBD treatment narrative around COVID-19 when comparing the web-based vaping narratives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. These results are key to understanding how vapers respond to inaccurate information about COVID-19, optimizing treatment of vapers who contract COVID-19, and possibly minimizing instances of inaccurate information. The findings have implications for the management of COVID-19 among vapers and the monitoring of web-based content pertinent to tobacco to develop targeted interventions to manage COVID-19 among vapers.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol/administration & dosage , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/etiology , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/etiology , Vaping/adverse effects , Vaping/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Cannabidiol/adverse effects , Cannabidiol/pharmacology , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Smokers/psychology , Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Social Media , Tobacco Products , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL